Proposal # X9.01-8721
ISRU Chemical Vapor Deposition (CVD) as a low-energy,
high-performance metals extraction and fabrication substitute for
Heavy Industries in support of Manned Exploration.
Galactic Mining Industries, Inc. // sysRand Corporation
Denver, Colorado 80212-2922 719-930-3161
spaceguy2008@aol.com www.space-mining.com www.sysrand.com

 

Phase 1 Proposal

 

Parts:

  1. Table of Contents                                                                                1
  2. Identification and Significance of the Innovation                            1
  3. Technical Objectives                                                                           6
  4. Work Plan                                                                                            7
  5. Related R/R&D                                                                                    9
  6. Key Personnel and Bibliography of Directly Related Work           10
  7. Relationship with Phase 2 or Future R/R&D                                   16
  8. Company Information and Facilities                                                 18
  9. Subcontracts and Consultants                                                            18
  10. Potential Post Applications                                                                 19

11.    Similar Proposals and Awards                                                     --      19

12.    Letter of Commitment from sysRand                                          --     20

13.    Letter of Commitment from Colorado School of Mines            --      21

 

Part 2:  Identification and Significance of the Innovation -

In-Situ Resource Utilization (ISRU) is the key enabler of future space travel and space exploration and colonization. It is essential to use materials indigenous to the Moon to build and support exploration missions, Moon bases and other space infrastructure construction programs. Present-day estimates are that it costs about $50,000 to $100,000 ("Tom Sullivan, pers. comm.")to take a one kilogram mass from the Earth to the surface of the Moon. With such a prohibitive cost, it will be essential to learn to “live off the land” on the Moon. Effective and efficient utilization of in-situ resources on the Moon must be maximized to provide the exploration effort with the infrastructure, propellants, and other material requirements necessary for lunar operations. Cost control for lunar and other space operations can be achieved by the use of in-situ resources.

 

This proposal describes iron reduction technology and Chemical Vapor Deposition (CVD) technology which are together capable of converting lunar soils into things such as oxygen and steel products. Analogous CVD technologies are used by International Nickel (INCO) of Canada to process over 100,000,000 pounds of nickel annually. CVD technology in this respect is not a laboratory curiosity, but is a well developed industrial process with significant levels of success.

 

Lifting mass from the lunar surface to Low-Lunar-Orbit requires approximately 1.6 percent of the energy needed to launch identical mass from Earth to the same LLO. NASA will require in situ materials (indigenous to the Moon) in the manufacture of infrastructure needed for manned lunar, martian and other missions. ISRU-based Chemical Vapor Deposition has the potential to convert lunar regolith - hydrogen reduced feedstocks to finished precision hardware (engines), structural components (pressure vessels, hulls) and tools (wrenches, etc.).  CVD is also very synergistic with other potential ISRU processes such as fiberglass.

 

In situ iron from lunar soils will be extracted by first converting the FeO (ferrous oxide) content to Fe0 (ferrum) iron metal by hydrogen reduction. This iron metal content is then extracted (digested) using gaseous digestion techniques such as carbonyl chemistry. The resultant volatile iron-containing gaseous molecules are used in Chemical Vapor Deposition (CVD) manufacturing techniques. Vapor deposition of steel alloys can produce pressure vessels, structural elements, tools and tooling, fasteners, mirror contours and other products needed to support lunar and martian exploration – with minimal machining. CVD of steel alloys is performed on internal and external surfaces of inflatable contours, slush cast molds, ISRU-fiberglass forms, and other suitable mold/mandrel contour objects.

 

CVD has great potential to be a major enabler of deep space missions and will revolutionize the options available for mission planners to develop extended duration manned and robotic space exploration missions. Significantly larger (and redundant) payload masses originating from LLO or L1 (when compared with provisioning from Earth’s surface) will enable longer duration sustainable missions and larger scope of exploration of Mars and CisLunar Space.

 

CVD of various materials is commonplace in today’s industrial economy. Diamond coatings are produced using relatively high-temperature techniques. The semiconductor foundry industry uses CVD of metals and other materials in the manufacture of devices such as computers, detection equipment, optical devices, etc.. ISRU low-temp CVD of steel to make structural steel components made of steel will significantly simplify extraction and recycling processes and will develop into real competition for the prevailing high-temperature steel processing paradigms employed by terrestrial applications, slashing energy needs and smokestack environmental impacts by obsolescing energy-intensive processes.

ISRU CVD Research Program Objectives

Our space exploration program is dominated and restricted by two realities: gravity and the rocket equation.  Until costs associated with the launch of material and men are lowered significantly, we will have to be clever and innovative if we are to afford extensive space exploration.

The ISRU approach is to launch less materiél into space, and what does get shipped are mostly factories. Factories will be able to provide real advantages by multiplying the amount of product produced from utilization of limited payloads brought from earth. A factory launched from earth that is made up of component modules for example will be able to produce hundreds or thousands of times their initial weights of extracted oxygen for propellants and breathing and extracted iron for making steel products. Success lies with fabricating products outside of Earth’s gravity well. Such a place with resources, energy and practical proximity to Earth is the Moon, which is well-positioned as a literal stepping-stone to Mars, Jupiter and beyond.  It is on and near Luna that we will fashion products from rocks and soil.

Those products include fuel storage containers, pressure vessels, dewars, habitats, structural steel components, rocket engine components, motors, plumbing, valves, etc., which usually have mass and bulk and, when manufactured from indigenous space resources, allow us to avoid lifting them out of Earth’s gravity well. ISRU CVD will allow for fabrication of bulkheads with high-precision docks, hatches and seals with limited high-precision machining.  When mounted on a mandrel the bulkheads form the anchors for double-walled dewars which are wrapped with ISRU FiberGlass composites, plated-up with CVD inside and out, and later the insulating cavity is injected with ISRU Silicon Aerogel.  Applications include pressure vessels, habitats, structural components, fiberglass hybrids, thin-films, ceramics, spacecraft components including thrusters, etc.

 

Near Side                          Far Side

Figure 1.

This image shows results of the Lunar Prospector analysis for iron content in the lunar regolith. Orange is 12% to 16% iron, with yellow near 18% iron concentration. Blue areas represent between 2% and 6% iron. These percentages are estimates and should not be used as exact data. A more detailed mapping of iron is found later in this proposal.

 

ISRU CVD foundry operations will support LEO, MEO and GEO operations, and  ISRU-sourced metals and fuels will make a new CisLunar economy possible, thereby making robust missions to Mars and Jupiter logistically possible.  ISRU CVD steel foundry operations can deliver fuel and oxidizer storage tanks, enabling ISRU oxygen extraction and storage to continue apace.  It is clear that the fusion of ISRU CVD with other ISRU products, such as ISRU FiberGlass, will redefine space transport and exploration infrastructures.

The top-level view of the project is expected to be applied directly to planning for projects such as:

²      Specialized and custom manufacturing of spare and original parts for exploration,

²      Projection of heavy industries based on steel for lunar habitation, transport and industry.

The potential capabilities represented by developing indigenous lunar capabilities in steel foundry capabilities are staggering.  This would appear to be an economically-advantageous way to finesse the rocket equation and be second perhaps to ISRU-LOX as a valuable exploration resource. The project will focus on steel alloys for apples-to-apples comparisons of low-energy ISRU CVD processes to conventional high-energy terrestrial steel foundries which do not appear to be adaptable to space..

Comparative Analysis

As in any credible trade study, it is important to conduct a comparative analysis of conventional iron extraction and steel production methods versus our proposed low-temperature CVD processes.  We are convinced that we will be able to demonstrate energy and logistical features which are very favorable to low-temperature CVD in space. A necessary precursor for most ISRU is hydrogen reduction of lunar soils, a process which extracts oxygen from the minerals. The process temperatures for hydrogen reduction of lunar soils and ores are 700°C to 900°C. Once the iron is in a reduced state, carbonyl (CO) digestion techniques (low temperature CVD) extract the metallic iron content by formation of iron pentacarbonyl. This formation of iron pentacarbonyl, from iron and carbon monoxide, proceeds in the temperature range of 75°C to 100°C. Iron pentacarbonyl is a gas/liquid which is then stored for later use in depositing steel compositions. Iron pentacarbonyl decomposition (CVD) is performed in the temperature range of 175°C to 200°C.

Conventional extractive/conversion steel foundry processes employed in the steel industry here on the Earth are very energy-intensive. Typical steel foundry process temperatures are between 1500°C, and 2000°C. The much higher temperatures used in conventional steel foundry operations give a clear advantage thermodynamically to our low temperature CVD techniques. The steel foundry operations on Earth require truly massive plant, special (and massive) refractory vessels and other heavy types of equipment. Terrestrial iron foundry operations consume very large quantities of energy (electricity). The heavy equipment and large energy requirements make conventional steel foundry operations in space logistically impractical.

Presented here is an overview of the types of iron foundry operations on Earth which have been used or are used today on Earth in the manufacture of steel:

  1. Bottom-Blown Acid Process.  Also known as the Bessemer Conversion this process uses ambient air to provide Oxygen as the reactive/transport agent to remove contaminants from molten iron in a refractory siliceous vessel.  Since nitrogen is the majority constituent of the atmosphere, the efficiency of heating air is slashed by the nitrogen/oxygen ratio (~4:1).
  2. Basic Bessemer Process.  Also known as the Thomas-Gilchrest process uses a basic flux instead of acidic, for the refining and conversion in a basic-lined vessel.
  3. Open Hearth Process.  Also named for its inventor, Karl Wilhelm Siemens, this process employs iron ore to oxidize the carbon and other contaminants in the molten metal.
  4. Oxygen Steel Making.  This process employs gaseous oxygen which provides a substantial improvement in process efficiency over its predecessors by eliminating nitrogen from the loop.
  5. Electric Furnace Steel Making.  This process has two principal versions, Basic Oxygen and Electric Arc, using carbon-graphite electrodes in a controlled atmosphere.  This 1500°C process temperature is typical of these conversion processes although Electric Arc has been optimized to a 400KW / ton electrical consumption.

 

Another problem of all of these conventional iron foundry processes in the lunar context is that rich ores, often approaching 60% iron, are required to make the process work.  The relatively low iron concentrations in regolith are non-functional for these processes, even if all of the other energy and mass problems are solved.

Iron is found in the lunar regolith (soil) in the form of FeO (ferrous oxide). FeO is found in the lunar soils in concentrations as high as 18%. The Maria regions on the near side of the moon show concentrations of FeO in the range of 12% to 18%. The Highlands regions show iron concentrations in the range of 2% to 6%. These levels of iron are well below the 60% purity necessary for conventional iron foundry operations. Our proposed hydrogen reduction – carbonyl digestion processing of lunar regolith is able to extract the iron from these low iron lunar soils. Of course, the Maria regions are preferred over the lower iron concentrations of the Highlands regions of the Moon’s surface.

The oxygen extracted by the hydrogen reduction of FeO results in large quantities of oxygen, useable as breathable air and as propellant oxidizer. A lunar oxygen plant is a great place to locate a carbonyl iron foundry operation on the surface of the Moon. Operations by companies where oxygen is produced on the Moon will be allied with our iron extraction/fabrication facilities to the benefit of both companies.

"It should be obvious from the above discussion that the CVD process needs a feedstock rich in metallic Fe.  It has been assumed that this would be the waste material from one of several oxygen-production processes.  For the Phase 1 portion of this SBIR, we will produce our own feedstock in much the manner that it might be done on the Moon.  Portions of terrestrial ilmenite will be completely reduced to metallic Fe and TiO2 in a hydrogen reduction furnace.  Lunar ilmenite contains only Fe2+ whereas terrestrial ilmenite also contains Fe3+ in addition to the major Fe2+.  However, such readily available starting material is suitable for hydrogen reduction, especially where kinetics are not a concern.  Such an experiment has already been conducted by Taylor et al. (1993) where they used both synthetic FeTiO3 as well as Fe3+ bearing terrestrial ilmenite.  The resultant waste product from this ilmenite reduction will form the feedstock for experimentation with the CVD process."(per Larry Taylor)

 

"If this process provides a suitable feedstock for the CVD process, an experiment will be conducted to form metallic Fe from the lunar soil simulant JSC-1A.  This will not be difficult, although the reduction kinetics are much slower."(per Larry Taylor)

 

Taylor, L.A., E.A. Jerde, D.S. McKay, M.A. Gibson, C.W. Knudsen, and H.

Kanamori, 1993, Production of O2 on the Moon:  A lab-top demonstration of ilmenite reduction with hydrogen.  Lunar & Planetary Science XXIV, Lunar and Planetary Institute, Houston, 1411-1412.

Figure 2.

This map of the Moon was made from the data collected by the Clementine Mission in the mid ‘90s.  Paul Lucey and colleagues at the University of Hawaii are responsible for the algorithms that permitted the raw data from multi-spectral imaging cameras to be transposed into this fully quantitative Fe compositional map of the Moon.  They used the Apollo soil chemistry in their modeling.  Notice that the maria on the near-side of the Moon vary in FeO content from about 12 to 18 wt%, whereas the majority of the far-side terrain, the true lunar highlands, is about 5 wt% FeO.  The yellow-orange at the bottom of the far-side map is the South Pole-Aiken Basin, a massive crater some 2400 km in diameter, which has excavated rocks from beneath the highland crustal cover, resulting in an average of ~10 wt% FeO for this large area. (per Larry Taylor)

Benefits of the Proposed Technology to NASA Missions

The main benefit of carbonyl (CVD) lunar foundry operations is the ability to produce large quantities of oxygen and to multiply the resultant tonnages of useable steel produced when compared to the weight of the equipment and process gases brought from Earth to begin with. The equipment is used over and over again in the operation of the lunar foundry. The process gases are recycled over and over again, allowing great quantities of iron products and oxygen to be produced with the finite and limited quantities of gases brought from the Earth. The equipment brought from Earth will be supplemented and added onto by the production of pressure vessels and other items using lunar derived steel. The way to look at these operations is to see that the steel foundry will replicate and multiply itself many times.

 

Many missions which will require launching significant masses to distant orbits will be two orders of magnitude less expensive and technically simpler to achieve using lunar resources. Lifting manufactured goods from the lunar surface to Lunar-Low-Orbit (LLO) requires approximately 1.6 per cent of the energy needed to launch the same mass from Earth to the same Lunar Orbit. Since ISRU CVD has the potential to convert the iron component of hydrogen reduced lunar regolith to finished hardware and structural components it has the potential to be a major enabler of deep space missions.

The next significant energy savings is realized by the intrinsic efficiencies and relatively ‘cool’ CVD process temperatures. These replace many energy-intensive separation, alloying and ‘working’ processes of conventional metals processing.  No smelting, casting, hot-rolling, extruding, forging and heavy machining is necessary.  Only light machining will be needed for drills, taps, and cleanup of flashing.

Energy-savings in concert with simplified processes will make the implementation of a lunar CVD foundry a reality which, in turn, will make ambitious and robust missions a fact.

The majority of missions originate on Earth. The more mission support provided in space leverages all missions. Missions which are enlarged/provisioned by bootstrapping in lunar orbit with materials and equipment produced on the lunar surface can be much larger and better supplied than missions which get their supplies solely from Earth. In-Situ Resource Utilization enables long duration missions. This will mean larger crews and more equipment and supplies on Mars and in Mars Orbit.  This suggests that a Jupiter Mission can have greatly enhanced numbers of robotic probes to target the gas giant and her complement of moons and other objectives.  Lunar CVD Foundry will allow mission masses which are multiples of those economically achievable from Earth.

ISRU CVD will also be a foundational component of any CisLunar economy and infrastructure, reducing the launch masses required for Lunar settlement.  Some of this capacity will be employed in the manufacture of manufacturing facilities on the Moon and elsewhere.  ISRU CVD will also enhance the value of other indigenous processes, especially the FiberGlass family.

This project is a multi-disciplinary effort incorporating Chemical Engineering, Industrial Manufacturing, ISRU and Systems Architecture expertise.

 

Figure 3.  Nickel CVD Tractor seat mold 24” x 24”

Part 3: Technical Objectives -

In Phase One the project will investigate:

  1. deposition of simple iron and steel alloys resulting in one or more test articles from iron-containing gases. Planning for Phase 2 research will include defining an analysis matrix of experiments to be carried on;
  2. formation of iron pentacarbonyl by digestion of iron powders. Planning for Phase 2 research will include defining an analysis matrix of gaseous extraction (CVD digestion) experiments. Iron will be extracted in Phase 2 from various forms of iron containing materials (iron powder, lunar soil simulants, powdered scrap metal) – note: glassy agglutinates in real lunar regolith, which contain iron may need to be ground or crushed to expose iron oxide and iron metal for the hydrogen reduction and carbonyl digestion steps of the processing;
  3. the ISRU context, including the distribution of minerals in lunar regolith and their utility as feedstock for reaction with hydrogen to release iron metal from the mineral/glass phases;
  4. the process structures necessary for a comprehensive front-to-back industrial CVD production;
  5. the energy requirements for each step of a comprehensive process.

 

The chemical vapor deposition of steel alloys will be briefly examined in Phase 1. Extensive work involving the chemical vapor deposition of nickel from nickel tetracarbonyl has been performed, however less work has been done on iron chemical vapor deposition. Nonetheless, William Jenkin of the company has performed ground-breaking work in the past on the iron deposition process. There are examples in the literature involving the chemical vapor deposition of iron and many other metals from volatile metal containing vapors.

In this Phase 1 research program we will digest iron powder using the carbonyl process in order to demonstrate the process of metals digestion as expeditiously as possible, with minimal risk to schedule. In this initial iron powder digestion we must use hydrogen reduction to convert oxides on the surface of the iron powder to iron metal, whereas in the hydrogen reduction of lunar soil simulants the hydrogen reduction process must convert the FeO content to metallic iron. In Phase 2 we will actually use the reactor developed for digestion of iron powder to research the reduction/extraction of iron from more complex iron feedstocks such as lunar soil simulants and finely divided scrap steel.

The investigation, systems architecture and definition of the ISRU context for CVD implementation will be conducted in order to provide validation of CVD as a low-energy process flow in an exploration setting.  The key components of the validation process are 1) a mapping of the distribution of minerals in lunar regolith using the current data sets made available by Clementine and Lunar Prospector Orbiters, 2) an enumeration of the utility of lunar minerals as feedstock for various processing which will produce oxygen and leave an iron metal rich byproduct destined for carbonyl iron extraction 3) an enumeration of potential, and high-value CVD products, 4) identification of other industrial processes, such as fiberglass which are enhanced (or enabled) by the availability of lunar-based CVD, 5) identification of the missions which are substantially enabled by lunar-based CVD.

Further systems architecture will yield the process structures necessary for a comprehensive front-to-back definition of industrial CVD production.  This ‘drill down’ of the processes, the flow of product components and integration with other exploration systems will provide the roadmap for the next stage of development (Phase 2).  This task stream will also indicate the opportunities for automation and the specification of custom manufacturing from terrestrial design centers to lunar-based CVD plants.

The necessary energy requirements for each step of a comprehensive front-to-back process will be characterized to include efficiencies, types and locations of energy inputs, and regenerative recovery opportunities (if any). Comparison with conventional steel foundry operations will clearly show the CVD energy requirements to be significantly less than conventional steel manufacturing requirements. Reduced energy consumption in the CVD foundry operations will result in significant savings over conventional steel foundry operations.

Part 4:  Work Plan -

The systems architects will develop and define a Work Breakdown Structure which will provide some guidance to the researchers in anticipating their laboratory needs and order of research and development.

Research Components

Deposition

The company has purchased a kilogram of iron pentacarbonyl to use in initial chemical vapor deposition of iron coatings. The control of carbon content and oxygen content in the resultant iron coatings will be addressed to a limited extent in the Phase 1 research, while the deposition of controllable steel alloys will be done in the Phase 2 research. CVD of iron/steel is done with these gases in varying concentrations - carbon monoxide, water, ammonia, nitrogen monoxide, trifluorophosphine, and hydrogen. It is believed that some of the more complex iron-bearing volatile species may yield more controllable steel alloys (for example, iron carbonyl/nitrosyl). The research into the formation of iron-bearing volatile species from lunar simulants will set the groundwork for design of actual lunar ore and soil processing equipment. Deposition of iron/steel is done in the temperature range of 175°C to 200°C. To prevent unwanted deposition of coatings it is necessary to maintain surface temperatures of less than 125°C in the areas where deposition is not desired.

Digestion

The detailed work plan involves the use of special stainless steel apparatus for the containment of the appropriate process gas mixtures. Iron powder will have a thin iron oxide corrosion surface layer which must be converted back to metallic iron by hydrogen reduction, prior to the process of carbonyl digestion. In the case of reduction of iron in lunar regolith simulants it is possible to collect and measure the resultant water vapor to determine the amount of iron converted in the stimulant. The various gases to be used in the iron digestion itself include; carbon monoxide, nitrogen monoxide, trifluorophosphine, hydrogen, nitrogen and noble gases (He, Ne, Ar).  An experiment series will be conducted using these gases individually, and as mixtures. Carbonyl extraction (digestion) of iron occurs with temperatures of 75°-100°C and carbon monoxide pressures of 200 to 3000 psi. Recent work by Butler, Debelak and Roth (Vanderbilt Univ., Nashville, TN)

have shown that ilmenite reduction was accelerated in the presence of catalysts. The catalysts mentioned are KCL (100% to 170% increased rates) and K2CO3 (164% to 276% increased rates). The temperature of reaction is greater than 8070C. This 807oC temperature is probably the best temperature for hydrogen reduction.

Measurements of resultant gaseous molecules will be done by measuring the infrared spectrum, densities, melting point/boiling point and other measurable characteristics of the resultant iron-bearing gases.

Development Components

Lunar In-Situ Resource Inventory

Lunar regolith minerals and their distributions have been compiled and published. This information will be examined in order to identify the most promising regions capable of sustained steel production.  Recent distribution data from the Clementine and Lunar Prospector Orbiters are used to determine iron concentrations over the surface of the moon. There are oxygen-producing processes that can use highland regolith (i.e., ~5% FeO) and result in useable oxygen and iron metal containing waste. Taylor & Carrier (1992) compiled and reviewed 20 different processes for the production of oxygen on the moon. They examined the feedstocks, masses, number of steps and relative potential for success in the lunar logistical situation.

 

Figure 4.  Top-Level ISRU Flow Diagram

The ore concentrations will probably not be the sole determinant for mission planning although the numbers may tip the scale when competing landing and development sites are down-selected. The lunar mares areas are preferred in the current work.

Process Inventory

1.        Hydrogen reduction of iron oxide to produce iron metal.

2.        Carbonyl reaction with iron metal to produce iron pentacarbonyl.

3.        Iron pentacarbonyl decomposition reaction producing a metallic coating of iron/steel.

The company, Galactic Mining Industries, Inc., has assembled a team of individuals which have extensive expertise in the required subject matter areas. Bill Jenkin has 17 U.S. Patents and 45 years experience in developing nickel CVD technology for industry. We have compiled a bibliography of over 50 U.S. Patents which deal with the subject of CVD of metals. The PI, Richard Westfall has extensive chemistry/physics research experience. Larry Taylor is the company’s Moon Geophysicist with over 350 publications involving lunar characterization and mission planning. Larry provides the company with the expertise to select locations on the Moon with useable iron concentrations. Larry also has expertise with the specifics of lunar mineral composition/availability. With the compilation of background information and the hands on experience of the chemistry team, we feel confident we can develop state-of-the-art processes capable of manufacturing steel products on the Moon using material feedstocks of materials found on the Moon. The two principal research matrices are the hydrogen reduction/preparation of the iron feedstock materials and the conditions and chemistry of steel coating CVD processes. Optimization of these technologies will be completed in Phase 2. Phase 1 will begin with modest work product goals. Bill Jenkin has already produced a limited number of iron coatings in work for John Lewis of the University of Arizona.

Lunar soils and pyroclastic deposits which have undergone the hydrogen reduction and carbonyl iron extraction can undergo further processing to extract the metals left behind. The metals of interest which are left behind after hydrogen reduction/carbonyl extraction processing include oxides of: aluminum, silicon, titanium and others. We propose taking this waste stream and dissolving it in molten salt baths (FLINAK, 4540C mp, for example) where through electrodeposition these other metals can be extracted for other industrial uses. The aluminum can be converted into aluminum alkyls (tri-isobutyl aluminum, for example). The aluminum alkyl is useable as a CVD gas in aluminum CVD deposition. The silicon can be used to make photovoltaic devices. The titanium can be used to make spacecraft components and structural components. The topic of new uses for the lunar regolith will be looked at in Phase 2 to provide direction for future research.

Steel Compositions are Controlled

Steel deposited by CVD can be modified by varying the amount of carbon included in the lattice, by impurities and by post deposition anneal cycles. Management of the process gas composition during steel deposition can be used to vary the carbon content of deposited films. Additional gases added to the gas stream during the digestion step can result in iron bearing gaseous products which have a mixture of ligands. Instead of iron pentacarbonyl, it is possible to form iron carbonyl-nitrosyl complexes. These gases show promise for making exceptionally low carbon steel coatings. Impurities such as boron can be added to dramatically improve mechanical properties of deposited coatings. In the case of nickel CVD coatings it is possible to increase the yield strength of deposited films to near 200,000 psi. The report at the end of phase 2 will provide details of areas of research which can result in unique and valuable coating technologies.

Industrial Issues

The industrial issues are largely logistical in nature and it is essential to develop familiarity with issues such as process gas compatibilities, storage for feedstock queueing, process gas reuseabilities and interactions, along with product type differentiation.  Energy requirements have to be quantified.

Architect a Production Facility

For maximum versatility in product types it is important to architect a production facility based on rapid prototyping methods so that terrestrial design centers can transmit design files and remotely set up a production run.  Each line of a plant will be designed to handle a certain scale of component, that is a finite range of sizes, where some lines build parts up to the size of an electric motor rotor, others up to a rocket nozzle, and yet others up to a large I-Beam.  Each front-to-back process will produce identical parts in a custom mass-production format until the line is reprogrammed to build something else.  Figure 4 is a starting point for development of a fully-fledged architecture.

Integrate CVD into other Manufacturing Processes

The feasibility of integrating steel CVD with ISRU-derived fiberglass will be investigated in order to manufacture high-quality composite products.  A plate-up of fiberglass forms with CVD to produce metal matrix composites will enable the manufacture of a wide variety of products on a broad scale of sizes. In future work aluminum metal matrix composites could be an important product line.

CVD cladding applied to glass fibers will be a precursory stage for another manufacturing process: combustion synthesis. This is accomplished by the chemical fusing of dissimilar metals as a replacement for epoxy, an organic product which will likely not be available on the Moon due to the scarcity of Carbon and Nitrogen.

Part 5:  Related R/R&D -

Galactic Mining Industries, Inc. has extensive in-house experience with the chemical vapor deposition of coatings of Nickel, Iron, Aluminum, and other metals. William C. Jenkin is specifically responsible for over 45 years of development of chemical vapor deposition of metals. In 1990, William Jenkin worked for Dr. John Lewis of the University of Arizona to develop techniques for the chemical vapor deposition of iron from iron pentacarbonyl.

The history of this work is outlined by the mass of papers and patents enumerated elsewhere in this document.

Figure 5. Nickel CVD of a Complex                      Figure 6. Experimental Apparatus – Iron Digestion on

                 Shape                                                                      the left – Deposition Test Chamber on right 

Part 6:  Key Personnel and Bibliography of Directly Related Work –

Richard M. Westfall – President and Research Director of Galactic Mining Industries, Inc. – Project Principal Investigator                                   

Mr. Westfall has worked for the government and private industry. He founded Galactic Mining Industries, Inc. in 1989. Galactic Mining Industries, Inc. has operated as a think tank for the last 15 years and is dedicated to developing the technical and legal foundations of space colonization. The focus of Galactic Mining Industries, Inc. has been the development of technology to use space reaources and to develop the legal basis for mining claims and property ownership in space. With the president’s focus on return to the moon, Mr. Westfall has decided to apply the Carbonyl chemistry which his company has prepared to the extraction of Iron from Lunar ores and soils for the in situ resource utilization of Lunar materials on the moon.

Mr. Westfall has extensive experience in scientific research. He is currently a Professional Research Associate (PRA) at the Physics Department of the University of Colorado Boulder. Mr. Westfall is employed by Dr. Allen Hermann of the Superconductivity Laboratory in the Physics Department. He has been employed for eleven years at the University of Colorado. Employment at the University of Colorado Physics Department has involved work as a chemist/physicist in the areas of photovoltaics, metal-hydride batteries, and laboratory support. While working for the University of Colorado Physics Department he for a time worked at the Lockheed Martin Plant southwest of Denver on photovoltaic research. The work performed at Lockheed Martin included vacuum system maintenance and upgrade, x-ray diffraction, surface roughness measurements using the Atomic Force Microscope (AFM) in the Keck Lab of JILA at the University of Colorado in Boulder and other tasks. Atomic Force Microscopy resulted in a more complete understanding of such measurements in the characterization of the flatness/roughness of photovoltaic device substrates.

Mr. Westfall began his scientific career at the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) in Boulder Colorado while still a University of Colorado Student. Work at NOAA involved the observation of atmospheric phenomena, and computer modeling of the atmosphere.

Mr. Westfall began work on photovoltaics in 1977 as a CU student on the Denver campus, with follow up research under Dean Bob Rogers of the graduate school on the Boulder campus. The material focused on at this time was Cadmium Telluride as a p-type semiconductor/absorber.

Mr. Westfall worked at the Solar Energy Research Institute (SERI) in Lakewood Colorado in 1979 and 1980. SERI is now the National Renewable Energy Lab  (NREL). While at SERI Mr. Westfall worked in the Photovoltaics Research Branch, under Dr. Sigurd Wagner. Duties there included vacuum system operations, thin-film coatings of II-VI compounds Cadmium Telluride (CdTe) and Cadmium Sulfide (CdS), device measurements and materials characterization. Hall and Van der Pauw measurements were performed to characterize carrier properties of films.

Mr. Westfall started a company by the name of C.E.L. Systems Corporation to continue this photovoltaic research. While working as C.E.L. Systems Corporation, Mr. Westfall received 3 U.S. Patents, 4,632,736, 4,826,579, and 5,215,631. These patents disclose electrolytic techniques for the production of crystalline materials for use in electronic devices.

Photovoltaic research at the University of Colorado under Dr. Allen Hermann involved the semiconductor Copper Indium Gallium Selenide (CuInGaSe2).

Battery research performed at CU Boulder successfully produced Nickel Metal Hydride Rechargeable Batteries. This work entailed Alloy-Metallurgy, Electrochemistry, Electrode Construction, Hermetic Packaging, Furnace Construction and other tasks.

Process chemistry work was performed for a company in Schertz, Texas (near San Antonio) by the name of Texas Medical Instruments. Work was performed under a U.S. Army contract for the White Sands Missile Range.  Indium Gallium Arsenide (InxGa1-xAs) and Mercury Cadmium Telluride (HgxCd1-xTe) were the materials used in the manufacture of linear photoresistive infrared detector arrays for night vision systems on military vehicles. Work included materials characterization, photoresists, device delineation, contact application, semiconductor modeling, and other tasks.

Most recently, in work for his company Galactic Mining Industries, Inc. Mr. Westfall has been involved in detailed literature studies involving the chemical vapor deposition techniques which will be useful in the colonization of space using in situ resources. Mr. Westfall asked William C. Jenkin to be involved, and Mr. Jenkin joined the team over ten years ago. This work on chemical vapor deposition carried on by Mr. Westfall and Mr. Jenkin has laid the theoretical foundation for the processing of Lunar materials and the production of steel on the moon.

Subject Matter Expert, Chemistry -William C. Jenkin - Galactic Mining Industries, Inc.

William Jenkin has over 45 years experience in developing Chemical Vapor Deposition techniques for industry. As of 1959, only a laboratory technology to perform Nickel CVD had been developed, at Commonwealth Engineering Company of Ohio.  At this time Jenkin was hired to direct technology development and help find applications.  An outstanding discovery during this period was that adding Carbon Monoxide to the deposition gases in the amount of 10% of the Nickel Carbonyl enormously increased uniformity of deposits.  Union Carbide Corporation sponsored the program until 1965, when it backed out because commercial applications had not been found.  From 1965 to 1968, W. C. Jenkin Company set up a lab and secured research contracts and continued technology development.

In 1968, Jenkin convinced AKRON STANDARD MOLD, Company (of Akron, Ohio) to set up a division of the company to make Nickel shell molds for various industrial polymer molding operations, including automobile tire molds.  Jenkin was the division manager.  This was the first jump to an industrial technology.  By 1971, experimentation led to an important development of technology where a mandrel (made of epoxy bonded with a mix of coarse & fine Aluminum powders) was heated on the back side by jetted hot heat exchange fluid while Carbonyl vapors were directed to the important “shaped” side and decomposed and formed a Nickel metal deposit thereon.  Another division of the company incorporated the 1/8” thick Nickel shells typically made into structures for the molding of plastics.

By 1972, several shells up to 6 ft long and weighing up to 100 lbs had been made.  Sales were slow because it was a new product, but also due to the recession of 1972.  This company, as well as the division, were unprofitable so the division was sold to the PRESSURE CHEMICAL COMPANY of Pittsburgh, Pa., in 1972.  It operated at the same location in Akron until 1975.  The purchaser was a chemical manufacturer and also made the Nickel Carbonyl that was being used. 

The PRESSURE CHEMICAL COMPANY continued to sponsor manufacture of Nickel shell molds and sold them to several firms.  Production was moved to New Kensington in 1975 and continued.  The sponsor (Pressure Chemical Co.) in early 1976 had a catastrophic fire at their main plant in the heart of Pittsburgh, and due to financial problems sold the CVD operation to FORMATIVE PRODUCTS of Detroit, a company that manufactured molds for polymer molding.  The operation remained in New Kensington.  Jenkin continued as manager and reported to a man named Steigerwald.  At the end of 1967 production was going smoothly.  The division set up to make their own Nickel Carbonyl in 1977.  In the fall of 1977, Jenkin departed by mutual agreement, and his assistant took over management.

This division of FORMATIVE PRODUCTS continued under several changes of managers until 1991, all this time making many 1/8” thick Nickel shells, one as long as 14 ft.  In 1991, the then manager, Kenneth Mackenzie, carelessly toxically exposed himself to Nickel Carbonyl vapors and spent 2 months in the hospital.  The medical treatment available enabled him to recover completely, but the company shut down for two months and lost their customers.  The division had also been on the verge of being bought by a Japanese firm, who then backed off.

In 1992, the operation was liquidated, assisted by Jenkin.  Remember, however, that Nickel shells were made in production from 1971 through 1992. 

Meantime, about 1994, a Nickel shell CVD operation was set up in Toronto, Canada, by Mirotech, Ltd.  Jenkin supplied technology consulting services to this group.  They operated until about 2000, when the owner-manager sold out.  They made small shells (20” or smaller) for tooling use, plus experimental shells for other uses.

In 1965, INCO Ltd., of Canada set up a Nickel shell CVD manufacturing operation in Sudbury, Ontario.  Nickel Carbonyl was already being made on a production scale of hundreds of million pounds per year here, thus the refining plant supplied the Nickel Carbonyl.  Jenkin provided limited consulting services as they used mainly the technology developed by the Toronto firm, Mirotech Ltd.

About 1994, a Japanese owned firm, FET Engineering, Inc., set up a Nickel shell CVD manufacturing operation in Fallon, Nevada.  They obtained technology and consulting services from Kenneth Mackenzie, who had been shop foreman for my and all operations in Akron and New Kensington from 1969 through 1992.  The operation continued for several years under the name New American TEC.

In 1999, the Fallon, Nevada operation developed serious technical problems and Mackenzie was sick and not available.  Jenkin was called and asked to render services and correct their problems, but Jenkin had a consulting contract with INCO Ltd., that barred him from working for them.  The last Jenkin heard, the company never recovered.  The problems must have been solvable, however, because Nickel shells were produced in Akron and New Kensington from 1971 through 1992. 

In 2003, a company, Weber Tool and Technology of Midland, Ontario, Canada, set up a Nickel shell CVD operation.  They obtained the technology by hiring INCO Ltd employees from the INCO Sudbury, Ontario, Canada operation.  Weber had been buying the Nickel shells that INCO made and finished the processing and mounting in structures for production molding of plastics.  So they took over the CVD.

Other applications of Nickel CVD that made it to production are coating of Carbon fiber “tow” with Nickel, plus at the same facility, the making of Nickel foam for batteries (by coating polyurethane foam).  This technology developed by Jenkin is currently being done in Clydach, Wales, U.K.   Another firm, Powdermet, Inc., in Pacoima, California, is currently coating powders with CVD Nickel.

There is continuing activity in developing industrial uses of Nickel CVD technology by Metal Matrix Composites, Inc., a firm in Midway, Utah.  They are currently perfecting technology to make fine solid Nickel fibers (dubbed “nanofibers”) directly from Nickel Carbonyl.  Their work is supported by research contracts with the U.S. Air Force.  The fibers made are exceptional in their ability to increase the electrostatic conductivity of epoxy type polymers, which the Air Force says is widely important in military equipment.  The base technology here was developed by Jenkin and is covered by his US Patent 5,130,204.  This firm is also perfecting technology to Nickel coat Carbon nanofibers under an Air Force research contract, for which they foresee a huge market.

 

United States Patents -

U.S. Patent 455,227, June 30, 1891, Ludwig Mond, Process of Making Compounds of Nickel and Carbon Monoxide

U.S. Patent 480,405, August 9, 1892, Clemens Jones, Process of Treating Ores Containing Hydrated Sesquioxide of Iron

U.S. Patent 760,852, May 24, 1904, J. Dewar, Manufacture of Nickel Carbonyl

U.S. Patent 1,783,744, December 2, 1930, Alwin Mittasch, Manufacture of Iron Carbonyl

U.S. Patent 1,802,155, April 21, 1921, Martin Muller-Cunradi, Stable Iron Carbonyl Composition

U.S. Patent 1,816,122, July 28,1931, Alwin Mittasch, Manufacture of Iron Carbonyl

U.S. Patent 1,816,476, July 28, 1931, C.G. Fink, Manufacture of Double Walled Receptacles

U.S. Patent 1,836,732, December 15, 1931, L. Schlecht, Production of Finely Divided Metals

U.S. Patent 1,868,044, July 19, 1932, Leopold Brandt of Dortmund-Horde, Germany, Assignor to Vereineigte Stahlwerke Aktiengesellschaft, of Dusseldorf, Germany, Method of Producing IronCarbonyl

U.S. Patent 1,909,762, May 16, 1933, Christopher Maurice Walter Grier, Method for the Production of Nickel Carbonyl

U.S. Patent 2,004,534, June 11, 1935, Carl Miller, Separation of Metals

U.S. Patent 2,070,079, February 9, 1937, Charles Frederick Reed Harrison, Manufacture of Nickel Carbonyl

U.S. Patent 2,086,881, July 13, 1937, Leo Schlecht, Production of Nickel and Iron Carbonyls

U.S. Patent 2,105,037, January 11, 1938, Charles Frederick Reed Harrison, Manufacture of Nickel Carbonyl

U.S. Patent 2,167,112, July 25, 1939, C.F.R. Harrison, Preparation of Nickel Carbonyl

U.S. Patent 2,212,459, August 20, 1940, K.M. Simpson, Recovery of Nickel from Nickel Containing Iron Ores

U.S. Patent 2,245,503, June 10, 1941, Leo Schlecht, Manufacture of Nickel Carbonyl

U.S. Patent 2,254,158, August 26, 1941, K.M. Simpson, Process of Recovering Nickel

U.S. Patent 2,344,138, March 14, 1944, F.E. Drummond, Coating Method

U.S. Patent 2,378,053, June 12, 1945, Albert Edward Wallis, Production of Iron Carbonyl

U.S. Patent 2,395,999, March 5, 1946, J.V. Fill, Method for the Manufacture of Metal Carbonyls

U.S. Patent 2,548,727, April 10, 1951, John F. Kincaid, Preparation of Nickel Carbonyl

U.S. Patent 2,590,078, March 25, 1952, Arthur Maeder, Process for the Manufacture of the Carbonyls of Nickel

U.S. Patent 2,599,978, June 10, 1952, O.F. Davis, Process of Plating Carrier Particles with a Catalytic Metal

U.S. Patent 2,602,033, July 1, 1952, J.J. Lander, Carbonyl Process

U.S. Patent 2,612,440, September 30, 1952, G.O. Altmann, Production of Metal Carbonyl Powders of Small Size

U.S. Patent 2,619,433, November 25, 1952, O.F. Davis, Method of Gas Plating

U.S. Patent 2,631,948, March 17, 1953, H.G. Belitz, Method and Apparatus for Gas Plating

U.S. Patent 2,650,564, September 1, 1953, A.O. Fink, Dynamic Pyrolytic Plating Apparatus

U.S. Patent 2,653,879, September 29, 1953, Albert O. Fink, Bonding of Metal Carbonyl Deposits

U.S. Patent 2,656,283, October 20, 1953, A.O. Fink, Method of Plating Wire

U.S. Patent 2,656,284, October 20, 1953, H.A. Toulmin, Jr., Method of Plating Rolled Sheet Metal

U.S. Patent 2,657,457, November 3, 1953, H.A. Toulmin, Jr., Continuous Metal Production and Continuous Gas Plating

U.S. Patent 2,749,255, June 5, 1956, H.R. Nack, Method of Producing Metallized Glass Fiber Rovings

U.S. Patent 2,791,515, May 7, 1957, H.R. Nack, Metal Coated Glass Fiber and Method of its Formation

U.S. Patent 2,757,077, July 31, 1956, R. Lewis, Method for Recovering Metallic Values from Ores Containing Iron and Nickel

U.S. Patent 2,824,828, February 25, 1958, H.J. Homer, Colored Glass Fibers and Method of Producing the same

U.S. Patent 3,070,469, December 25, 1962, William C. Jenkin, Method of Encapsulation of Lithium Borohydride, Class 149-5, Commonwealth Engineering Company

U.S. Patent 3,086,881, April 23, 1963, William C. Jenkin, Method for Securing Adhesion of Gas Plating, Class 117-50, Union Carbide

U.S. Patent 3,158,499, November 24, 1964, William C. Jenkin,  Method of Depositing Metal Coatings in holes, tubes, crack, fissures & the like , Class 117-107.2, Union Carbide

U.S. Patent 3,160,517, December 8, 1964, William C. Jenkin Method of depositing metals & metallic compounds through-out the pores of porous body, Class 117-93.3, Union Carbide

U.S. Patent 3,167,831, February 2, 1965, William C. Jenkin, Gas Plated Metal Shell Molds & Patterns, Class 22-136, Union Carbide

U.S. Patent 3,176,356, April 6, 1965, William C. Jenkin, Method & Apparatus for Obtaining the Release of Gas Plated Deposits from Substrate Surfaces, Class 22-57.3, Union Carbide

U.S. Patent 3,196,003, July 20, 1965, William C. Jenkin, Process for Making Metal Strips & Sheets from Waste Metal, Class 75-62, Union Carbide

U.S. Patent 3,213,827, October 26, 1965, William C. Jenkin, Apparatus for Gas Plating Bulk Material to Metallize the Same, Class 118-49.5, Union Carbide

U.S. Patent 3,219,482, November 23, 1965, William C. Jenkin, Method of Gas Plating Adherent Coatings on Silicon, Class 117-213, Union Carbide

U.S. Patent 3,355,318, November 28, 1967, William C. Jenkin, Gas Plating Metal Deposits Comprising Boron, 117-107.2, Union Carbide

U.S. Patent 3,466,229, September 9, 1969, William C. Jenkin, Metallizing Plastics by Gas Plating (John R. Whitacre & W.C. Jenkin), Class 204-30, Union Carbide

U.S. Patent 3,554,880, January 12, 1971, William C. Jenkin, Process for Electroplating Polyoxymethylene Resins, Class 204-30, Dupont

U.S. Patent 3,619,288, November 9, 1971, Erhard Sirtl, Process for Precipitating a High Melting Metal-Contact Layer at Low Temperatures

U.S. Patent 4,187,200, February 5, 1980, William C. Jenkin, Method of Making a Supported Catalyst

U.S. Patent 4,606,941, August 19, 1986, William C. Jenkin, Deposition Metallizing Bulk Material by Chemical Vapor

U.S. Patent 4,632,736, December 30, 1986, Richard M. Westfall, Electrolytic Preparation of Tin

U.S. Patent 4,826,579, May 2, 1989, Richard M. Westfall, Electrolytic Preparation of Tin and Other Metals

U.S. Patent 4,938,999, July 3, 1990, William C. Jenkin, Process for Coating a Metal Substrate by Chemical Vapor Deposition using a Metal Carbonyl

U.S. Patent 5,008,160, April 16, 1991, William C. Jenkin, Method of Securing Adherent Coatings by CVD from Metal Carbonyls, and Articles Thus Obtained

U.S. Patent 5,130,204, July 14, 1992, William C. Jenkin, Randomly Dispersed Metal Fiber Mat

U.S. Patent 5,215,631, June 1, 1993, Richard M. Westfall, Electrolytic Preparation of Tin, other Metals, Alloys and Compounds

Published Articles and Non-Published Notes -

Forms of Iron Deposited by the Thermal Decomposition of Iron Pentacarbonyl in the Gas Phase, D. Beischer, Z. Electrochemie, 45, 310-13(1939)

Iron and Nickel by Carbonyl Treatment, R.M. Lewis, Journal of Metals, June 1958, 419-424

Twenty-Five Years Progress in Nickel Refining, The Industrial Chemist, December, 1959, 583-588

The Kinetics of Nickel Carbonyl Formation, W.M. Goldberger, I&EC Process Design and Development, 1962, 202-2090

Direct Synthesis of Trifluorophosphine Complexes of Cobalt as well as of Nickel and it’s Homologs, Thomas Kruck, Chem. Ber. 101, 138-142, (1968)

Phosphorus-Fluorine Compounds, Part XIV, Direct Synthesis of Tetrakis(fluorophosphine) Complexes of Zerovalent Nickel, John Nixon, J. Chem. Soc. (A), 1969, 1089-1091

Shortened Route to Pure Nickel, International Nickel Co., Chemical Engineering, November 24, 1975, 54-55

Letter from Dr. John Lewis, The University of Arizona, to William C. Jenkin, December 14, 1989, involving research on Iron CVD

Kinetic Study of the Chemical Vapor Deposition of Iron Films Using Iron Pentacarbonyl, Francisco Zaera, Langmuir, 1991, 7, 1188-1191

Analysis of Various Carbonyl Systems, F.A. Houle, J. Phys. Chem., 96, 10425 (1992)

Dissociation Dynamics of Core Excited Iron Carbonyl Nitrosyl, M. Simon – Lure, Univ. Paris-sud, Orsay, France; Serial Title: AIP Conference Proceedings, Issue: 258, 1992, pp. 323-31

Magnetic Properties of Vapor-Deposited Iron-Noble-Metal Multilayers, B.X. Liu, (Dept. of Mater. Sci. & Eng., Tsinghua Univ., Beijing, China); Physical Review B (Condensed Matter), v. 48, n. 14, 1 Oct. 1993, pp. 10276-83

JSC-1: A New Lunar Soil Simulant, David S. McKay, Engineering, Construction, and Operations in Space IV, American Society of Civil Engineers, pp. 857-866, 1994

Pattern Generation Below 0.1 micron by Localized Chemical Vapor Deposition with the Scanning Tunneling Microscope, A. de Lozanne, (Dept. of Phys., Texas Univ., Austin, TX, USA) Japanese Journal of Applied Physics, Part 1 (Regular Papers & Short Notes), v. 33, n. 12B, Dec. 1994, pp. 7090-3

Initial Stages of Fe Chemical Vapor Deposition onto Si(100), D.P. Adams, Physical Review Letters, Volume 74, Number 25, 19 June 1995, 5088-5091

Three-Dimensional Laser Chemical Vapor Deposition of Nickel-Iron Alloys, J.L. Maxwell, (Center for Integrated Electronics & Electronics Manufacture, Rensselaer Polytech. Inst., Troy, NY, USA); Advanced Laser Processing of Materials – Fundamentals and Applications. Symposium, 1996, pp. 601-606. Conference: Advanced Laser Processing of Materials – Fundamentals and Applications, 27-30 Nov. 1995, Boston, MA, USA. Publisher: Mater. Res. Soc., Pittsburgh, PA, USA

Atmospheric Laser Chemical Vapour Deposition of Iron-Carbon Composites, P.C. Chen, (Dept. of Chem., Spelman Coll., Atlanta, GA, USA;); Journal of Materials Science Letters, v. 14, n. 18, 15 Sept. 1995, pp. 1289-91

Infrared and Ultraviolet Laser-Assisted Deposition from Iron Pentacarbonyl, R. Alesandrescu, (Laser Dept., Inst. of Atomic Phys., Bucharest, Romania); Optical Engineering, v. 35, n. 5, May 1996, pp. 1377-82

Real-Time Volumetric Growth Rate Measurements and Feedback Control of Three-Dimensional Laser Chemical Vapor Deposition, J.L. Maxwell, (Lab. For Micromanufacturing, Louisiana Tech. Univ., Ruston, USA;); Applied Physics A (Materials Science Processing), v. A67, n. 3, Sept. 1998, pp. 323-9

Iron-Iron Oxide Composite Thin Films Prepared by Chemical Vapor Deposition from Iron Pentacarbonyl, T. Maruyama (Dept. of Chem. Eng., Kyoto Univ., Japan); Shinyashiki, Y. Source: Thin Solid Films, v. 333, n 1-2, 23 Nov. 1998, pp. 203-206

Preparation of Iron Nanoparticles by Chemical Vapor Condensation, C.J. Choi, (Korea Inst. of Machinery & Metals 66, Changwon, South Korea;); Materials Letters, v. 56, n. 3, Oct. 2002, pp. 289-94

Microstructure and Orientation of Iron Crystals by Thermal Chemical Vapor Deposition with Imposition of Magnetic Field, N. Yoshikawa, (Dept. of Metall., Tohoku Univ., Sendai, Japan;); Journal of Materials Research, v. 17, n. 11, Nov. 2002, pp. 2865-2874

 

Subject Matter Expert, Lunar Geochemist:  Dr. Lawrence A. Taylor

Distinguished Professor of Earth & Planetary Sciences

Director, Planetary Geosciences Institute        http://web.utk.edu/~pgi

University of         Tennessee                                             Telephone:  (865) 974-6013

Knoxville, TN 37996                                                            FAX: (865) 974-6022 e-mail:  lataylor@utk.edu

Expertise:  material scientist/geologist:  Lunar regolith & soil science and soil characterization; chemical, physical, & geotechnical properties of Lunar regolith; Lunar dust abatement; microwave heating of Lunar soil and Lunar simulants;  Oxygen-production processes; development of proper Lunar simulant; design and development of process for Lunar and martian regolith heating for the production of Oxygen; trafficability on Lunar surface: Lunar ‘ground truth’, etc.

EDUCATION

1958 – 1963            B.S. 1961; M.S. 1963; Indiana University, Bloomington, IN

1965 – 1968            Ph.D. 1968; Lehigh University, Bethlehem, PA; Geol. Sci./Materials Sciences

PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE

Dr. Taylor is a petrologist/geochemist who practices materials science on geologic materials.  He is a long-time “lunatic”, having worked on Lunar samples since the first return of materials during the Apollo 11 Mission.   He and his research group continue these studies ever enthusiastically today.  His early background in the mining industry and his initial education in economic geology and materials sciences have greatly aided his applications of Lunar science for the study of the In-Situ Resource Utilization (ISRU) of the Moon and Mars.